Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Editorial: Think again on curriculum oversight of private schools

Editorial: Think again on curriculum oversight of private schools

  • 0
Support this work for $1 a month

Imagine this, if you can: Canisius High School, from whose halls 99 percent of 2018 graduates headed to college, is forced to submit to evaluation by the Buffalo School Board, leaders of a district that graduates 65 percent of its students.

The same could happen to the Nichols School, 85 percent of whose seniors were admitted to “most competitive” or “highly competitive” colleges.

Those are just two of the absurdities that could occur if the state’s education policymakers go ahead with a cockamamie plan to require local school districts to review the curricula at independent schools. It’s being pitched as a way to ensure that academic instruction at private schools is “substantially equivalent” to that at public schools, an idea that raises an interesting question: If education in private schools was merely equivalent to their public counterparts, why would parents fork over the tuition to send their children to them?

Nevertheless, the state is proposing that new independent schools be reviewed within three years of their start of operation. Existing private schools would be reviewed by the end of the 2022-23 school year, with regular inspections thereafter. Discussions suggest the state is focusing on private schools with grades K to 8, though the suspicion among private school leaders is that it would eventually be expanded to include high schools.

It’s a bad idea and there are better ways to ensure private school students are being appropriately educated.

Private schools object to the plan – and for good reason – but they’re not alone. Public schools are already awash in regulations and challenges; they don’t need another burden that does nothing to benefit their own students or serve the interests of their taxpayers.

As is often the case, the proposal arises out of a legitimate issue, but as Albany likes to do, it is suggesting an unnecessarily broad policy to respond to problems at certain schools. There are better options.

In this case, critics have long complained that some ultra-Orthodox Jewish schools downstate are not teaching enough secular subjects. If those students are receiving a substandard education, one that puts them at a disadvantage, then the state surely has an interest in their plight.

But if that is the case, then that is where policymakers need to direct their attention. If one driver habitually speeds on a dangerous road, you don’t ticket all motorists.

Indeed, the state already has a system set up to deal with its troubled public schools. It’s called receivership. Schools that chronically fall short of standards can be redirected into that more aggressive form of oversight. It works. Education Commissioner MaryEllen Elia noted in December that 49 of the 52 schools in receivership around the state had showed “demonstrable improvement.”

It’s the kind of approach this page has argued should be applied to staffing at nursing homes. Some advocates want to pass a “safe staffing” bill that would apply to all nursing homes – even those that serve their residents well and sensibly deploy staffs according to their facility’s needs. Instead, the law should focus on the problem facilities to produce improvement.

Why not do the same for private schools that fall short of standards? Surely there is no point in spending time, money and energy to pester the ones that aren’t broken. Let them continue their good work unmolested by the state.

But for the others, some form of close oversight may be appropriate. It probably shouldn’t be local school districts, given their own pressures and challenges, but some mechanism should be devised to respond effectively to persistent failure.

The Rev. David Ciancimino, president of Canisius High School, put the matter succinctly in a letter to the school community. “Canisius greatly exceeds state standards, making the proposed mandate superfluous.” So, why?

Albany needs to put on its thinking cap and try again. Here’s a thought: Maybe it should send public school officials to be reviewed by Canisius and its peers.

Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alerts

Breaking News