Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Bob McCarthy: For the GOP, outlook not so good

Bob McCarthy: For the GOP, outlook not so good

  • 0
Support this work for $1 a month
Leading Conservatives Attend Annual CPAC Conference

Speaker of the House Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wisc., is retiring from Congress after this term, and Dr. Jim Campbell is projecting the Democrats will take the House in the November election. (Getty Images)

Just about every political expert in captivity is pontificating this election season on who will control the House of Representatives following the November mid-term election. Most forecast a big Democratic win.

But pay no attention to those impostors behind the curtain. The guy who really matters is Dr. Jim Campbell, distinguished professor of political science at the University at Buffalo and one of the nation’s foremost experts on reading election tea leaves.

Campbell has been performing his permutations and calculations for decades. He is a political scientist for a reason, because his predictions stem from a scientific approach involving a host of mathematical, economic and sociological factors.

And he’s good at it. His presidential prognostication becomes more anticipated throughout the nation each election cycle, and his formula to anoint a winner has pretty much been on target when applied to every election dating to 1948.

This year, his crystal ball sees Democrats gaining as many as 44 seats, firmly controlling the House. Republicans will continue to rule the Senate, where Campbell sees them gaining two seats.

If the professor’s predictions exceed those of others, it may stem from the “seats in trouble” model he uses in collaboration with Charlie Cook of the Washington-based Cook Political Report. Campbell’s model zeroes in on each seat, combining input from district experts with Cook’s classic “solid, leaning, toss-up, or likely to change” classifications, along with statistical analysis of partisan seat change.

Campbell calls it a “value added” approach; using the local data with other factors to construct a national model.

“Historically, the party with more seats that are vulnerable loses more than just the seats identified as in trouble,” Campbell told the Politics Column. “It’s like Cook may pick up a wave in August that’s going out to sea, but by the time it reaches shore, now it’s much bigger.”

Two of the Republican seats in trouble this year are in New York – John Faso’s 19th District and Claudia Tenney in the 22nd. The race for the 27th held by Chris Collins – for all of his legal difficulties – is still seen as likely Republican.

Campbell recognizes that in almost all mid-term elections during a presidential first term, the party in congressional power loses seats. In 1994, for example, Democrats lost 54 seats during Bill Clinton’s first term. They lost 64 in 2010 under first-termer Barack Obama. So it can be expected that GOP control of the House faces a natural threat.

Under Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Clinton and Obama, each party suffered double digit losses when presidential approval dipped to around 40 percent. Last week, President Trump last week slipped well below 40 percent in at least three national polls.

“You expect a president with approval ratings of 40 percent to take a pretty good hit,” Campbell said.

But the current Republican majority was still elected in 2016 with Trump and his high unfavorable numbers leading the ticket. That aspect has not changed, he noted, but maybe voters have.

“The side out of office gets angrier and more motivated to vote,” he said, pointing to conservatives and tea party types venting against Obama in 2010.

“Now it’s the left that has built up anger and that may pull people to the polls,” he said. “And maybe the Trump people have become complacent.”

This time the stars, moons and planets also favor Democrats because 44 Republicans are “retiring” from the House, providing an advantage to Democratic challengers facing opponents without the advantage of incumbency.

Then again, many of those retirees may have seen the same negatives forecast by Campbell and got out while the getting was good.

All of this points strongly to Nancy Pelosi regaining the speaker’s gavel during a January ceremony on the rostrum of the House. For politics watchers, the show will be very much worth watching.

“The new odd couple,” Campbell says, “Nancy Pelosi and Donald Trump.”

Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

  • Updated

What a seismic difference a trial has made to public and media perceptions of Kyle Rittenhouse. When he was charged at age 17 with shooting three men, two fatally, during racial unrest in Kenosha, Wisconsin, last year, various media accounts described him as a rifle-toting white supremacist who drove across the border to shoot Black Lives Matters protesters in the racial unrest that followed ...

  • Updated

What can sensible adults agree on regarding Kyle Rittenhouse, the latest young symbol on whom America can hang its devastating internal division and the newest tool for social media networks to monetize without regard to individual and societal hurt? Those who believe in the rule of law, which should be all of us, might start with the notion that a murder trial involving self-defense is no ...

  • Updated

Kyle Rittenhouse is 18 years old. On Aug. 25, 2020, when Rittenhouse killed two men during a night of civil unrest in Kenosha, Wisconsin, he was 17. But when he took the stand during his murder trial, he looked like he could be 13. Defendants in murder trials often do themselves no favors by testifying in their own defense, but Rittenhouse probably helped himself. He was soft-spoken and ...

  • Updated

Since 1984, the nationwide legal drinking age has been 21 for good reasons. Young people’s brains are still developing, which affects their judgment and cognitive abilities. That, along with raging hormones, boosts the chances of impulsive decision-making. It’s a dumb idea to add alcohol to an already unstable mix. It makes even less sense to add firearms to that unstable mix. Perhaps it’s ...

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alerts

Breaking News