Skip to main contentSkip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.

Pigeon and Sedita emerge as key figures in Erie County district attorney race

  • 0
Support this work for $1 a month

Be prepared for a long, intense Erie County district attorney primary this summer dominated by two names not even on the ballot – G. Steven Pigeon and Frank A. Sedita III.

Two challengers for the post in the Democratic contest are already aiming at acting District Attorney Michael J. Flaherty Jr. with claims he was a key third party in a long political relationship involving Sedita – the former district attorney – and Pigeon – the Democratic operative indicted last week on nine counts of bribery and grand larceny.

Now, as Democrats John J. Flynn Jr. and Mark A. Sacha compete with Flaherty for the Democratic nomination in the September primary, the Pigeon indictment and its ramifications are emerging as the over-arching issue of a campaign already in high gear.

“It will definitely be the central issue of the race because I don’t think Flaherty can separate himself from Sedita,” said Flynn, a former Tonawanda town justice running with the endorsement of party leaders.

Sacha, a former assistant district attorney, says Flaherty has always held membership in a political clique that included Sedita and Pigeon.

Sedita fired Sacha in 2009 after Sacha publicly charged Sedita with providing Pigeon a political pass on alleged election law violations.

“From the get-go, Pigeon was an essential part of this political relationship with not only Sedita, but Flaherty,” Sacha said. “When Sedita came in, everybody knew that was the way it worked. If anyone needed a reminder, all they had to do was take a look at me.”

Flaherty finds himself on the defensive after a special grand jury returned indictments against Pigeon and former state Supreme Court Justice John A. Michalek, leading to the judge’s resignation last week. But since taking over as acting district attorney in January following Sedita’s election to State Supreme Court, Flaherty has worked to distance himself from the former top prosecutor whom he once served as second in command.

Early on, Flaherty established a public integrity unit to probe the official corruption that critics said Sedita ignored. He also re-opened the Barry Moss hit-and-run death probe from 2013 that Sedita refused to prosecute, though Flynn and Sacha have attacked his role in that case, too.

On Wednesday, Flaherty again distanced himself from his former boss while emphasizing his “independence” from the Democratic “bosses” who have endorsed Flynn. He called the charges “empty allegations.”

“I am not my predecessor and I established that very quickly,” he said. “They can try to link Frank Sedita to Steve Pigeon and then to me but they have no facts to support it.”

Flaherty said that no Pigeon prosecution ever occurred under Sedita because “that was Frank’s way of running the office.”

“Now you see my way of running the office,” he said.

But Sacha and Flynn say Flaherty’s connections to Sedita – and by association to Pigeon – run deep. Sacha cites records from a 2012 deposition stemming from the wrongful dismissal suit he filed against Sedita and lost.

In the document he provided The Buffalo News on Wednesday, Sacha pointed to Sedita’s testimony under oath in which he acknowledged meeting with Pigeon and Flaherty at the West Seneca home of Pigeon’s mother to discuss launching the 2008 campaign for district attorney.

Flaherty denies the claims of Flynn and Sacha that he served as Sedita’s campaign manager in 2008, contending the candidate’s cousin – attorney Joseph V. Sedita – held the post. He acknowledges working on the campaign as a volunteer.

But the testimony transcript provided by Sacha on Wednesday recorded Sedita as identifying Flaherty as campaign manager. Sacha said Flaherty was present when Sedita made the statement during the 2012 deposition.

“The candidate must be confused,” Sacha said.

Flynn also contends Flaherty served as Sedita’s campaign manager and as Sedita’s top aide. He said it is important to note Pigeon’s relationship.

“It says that Flaherty either agreed and didn’t do anything [about Pigeon’s activities], or he turned a blind eye,” Flynn said. “Neither situation shows any leadership abilities.”

In addition, Flynn noted Flaherty did not win support of party leaders in 2014 during his bid for a state Supreme Court seat. But Pigeon supported a slate at the judicial nominating convention that included Flaherty.

“Pigeon has his footprints all over Flaherty and Sedita for the past eight years, and there is no way Mike can separate himself from that,” he said. “And I’m going to hammer that home.”

The winner of the September Democratic primary will face Conservative-Republican Joseph V. Treanor III in November.


* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

Listen now and subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts | Spotify | Stitcher | RSS Feed | Omny Studio

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alerts

Breaking News