Share this article

print logo

Lack of response to Syrian slaughter is unconscionable

Reports are coming in of yet another episode in which Syrian security forces have opened fire on a crowd of peaceful protesters. Which raises the question: What will it take to move Western democracies to respond to the serial slaughters of civilians by the regime of Bashar al-Assad?

The latest bloodshed took place Tuesday morning in the city of Homs, where thousands of people occupied a central square Monday night, pitched tents and vowed to remain until their demands for political change were met.

Information is fragmentary, but reports from residents gathered by the BBC and a video posted on YouTube indicate that security forces stormed the square in the early morning hours, firing with automatic weapons.

"Listen to the shooting," one caller told the BBC. "Can you hear it? It's hammering on us like rain." The death toll was uncertain, though one BBC correspondent was told eight had died.

Mass shootings of civilians by security forces are becoming a near-daily event in Syria. In Daraa, where the protest movement began last month, there have been multiple massacres, including one on April 8 in which gunmen opened up on a crowd marching with olive branches, killing 27. There have been similar episodes in Banias and in several nearby villages. And these are just the ones that human rights groups have been able to document.

All together, considerably more than 200 people have been killed by the regime. The government mixes its repression with empty promises of change: Hours after the shootings Tuesday it announced that it was lifting a decades-old emergency law. But opening fire on crowds was not permitted even under emergency rule. There is no indication that it will stop now -- unless the regime is toppled or comes under severe international pressure.

In nearly every instance in which state-sponsored murder on this scale has taken place in recent years, the United States and other democracies have reacted strongly. Yet the response to Assad's bloodshed has been limited to rhetoric. President Obama called the shootings in Daraa "abhorrent," but the administration has refrained from taking even diplomatic measures to express its dissatisfaction, such as withdrawing the U.S. ambassador in Damascus.

Syria, mind you, is not a friend of the United States. It is Iran's closest ally in the Arab world and a sponsor of the Hezbollah and Hamas militias. For years it provided a transit route for suicide bombers headed to Iraq to kill American soldiers. It tried to secretly build a nuclear reactor with the help of North Korea.

Yet even when faced with extraordinary human rights crimes, the Obama administration remains passive. At first this response was puzzling. Then it looked badly misguided. Now it has become simply unconscionable.

Jackson Diehl is deputy editorial page editor at the Washington Post. This column was excerpted from the Post's opinion blog.

There are no comments - be the first to comment