Mr. Speaker, please don't.
Go ahead, if you must, and cut taxes. Slash spending. Repeal health care. I understand. Elections have consequences. But BlackBerrys and iPads and laptops on the House floor? Reconsider, before it's too late.
The current House rules bar the use of a "wireless telephone or personal computer on the floor of the House." The new rules, unveiled last week, add three dangerous words. They prohibit any device "that impairs decorum."
If the Senate is the world's greatest deliberative body, the House is poised to be the world's greatest tweeting one.
A few upfront acknowledgments. First, I'm not one to talk. I have been known to sneak a peak, or 10, at my BlackBerry during meetings. For a time my daughter had my ring tone set to sound like a squawking chicken; when I invariably forgot to switch to vibrate, the phone would commence clucking during meetings. In short, I have done my share of decorum impairing.
Second, let's not get too dreamy about the House floor. John Boehner, the incoming speaker, once passed out campaign checks from tobacco companies there. Worse things have happened on the House floor than a game of Angry Birds -- check it out! -- on the iPad.
Nonetheless, lines have to be drawn and the House floor is not a bad place to draw them. Somehow, it has become acceptable to e-mail away in the midst of meetings.
The larger war may be lost, but not the battle to keep some remaining space in life free of gadgetry and its distractions. I'm not talking Walden Pond -- just a few minutes of living the unplugged-in life. There are places -- dinner table, church, school and, yes, the House floor -- where multitasking is inappropriate, even disrespectful.
It's not that everyone is going to be raptly attentive during every moment in those venues. But it's wrong to facilitate and legitimize the inevitable zoning out, and healthy to have a few minutes of enforced absence from the addictive world of instantaneous communication.
And there is something particularly depressing in the symbolism of the House floor as atomized democracy, with every individual lawmaker cocooned in his or her techno-bubble, more immersed in the virtual world than the real-life chamber.
The new majority presents the change as a matter of updating "antiquated rules," as transition spokesman Brendan Buck told National Journal's Major Garrett. "Prohibiting the use of all electronic devices on the House floor is an obstacle to efficiency," Buck said.
Perhaps, but efficiency is not always the highest good. What about tradition, dignity and that fusty concept, decorum? Justice Antonin Scalia has been reading briefs on his iPad, Justice Elena Kagan on her Kindle, but it would be disconcerting to see them taking the bench with their devices. There is something charming in the Senate as an institution that retains spittoons but bans smartphones. At least in theory: Like teenagers texting under the table at dinner time, senators have been known to ignore the rules. As Michael Shear reported in the New York Times, Massachusetts Democrat John Kerry was immersed in his BlackBerry the other day while his Pennsylvania colleague Arlen Specter delivered a farewell address.
In the House, the incoming majority leader, Virginia Republican Eric Cantor, was caught tapping away on his BlackBerry during the president's address to a joint session of Congress on health care reform. (Cantor said he was reading the presidential text and taking notes.)
But a previous wink does not require a current nod. Mr. Speaker, put down that iPad.