Share this article

print logo

Rewinding the weekend

Some notes collected while adjusting my antenna:

Most surreal TV sight of the day: The computer graphic that pops up on my Time Warner
cable still said, "NFL Football." And for a second, with the music and
the polished graphics and the big CBS Sports logo, I thought maybe a
settlement had been reached.

But no. It was the 1 p.m. start of SMU
taking on Memphis in Conference USA men's soccer on the CBS College
Sports Network
. The weirdest thing was that the announcers were so hyped up the introduction of the contest that you would have thought it was an NFL game.

• • •

Painful picture-in-picture: Denny Hamlin went hard into the Talladega wall (and would be hospitalized overnight) on ABC at almost the same exact minute Trent Edwards went hard into the University
at Phoenix Stadium turf on CBS. 

• • •

Blitz's best: Chris Berman has his faults ("The Swami?" I forsee the same
self-indulgent schtick he did last year!), but there is no more
entertaining place to get the NFL highlights than "The Blitz," the
quasi-show built into ESPN's Sunday night Sportscenter after the NFL put the
kibosh on the classic NFL Primetime a few years back.

In a few minutes, you get a few laughs along with your key plays
and some quality analysis by Tom Jackson. It's the perfect combo of serious yet fun --
this is sports, after all.

Berman dropped oldie-but-a-goodie
"Marshall, Marshall, Marshall" when Terrell Owens tied Marshall Faulk
on the all-time touchdown list [speaking of oldies but goodies, check
for the explanation of that catchphrase as well as an impressive
database of others from a few years back -- I just spent a good eight
minutes reliving Craig Kilborn's heyday. Pardon me for a moment ...

Berman warbled a little "Moon River" for Keith Rivers of the
Bengals after he made an interception, but his best line was ripped
from today's presidential-race headlines. When Ravens running back
LeRon McClain pounded into the end zone, the call was "McClain, he's a
maverick, Tom!"

• • •

No fuego: On a less entertaining highlight show, ESPN
refugee (or is it evacuee?) Dan Patrick just couldn't resist during the
highlights of the Colts-Texans game during halftime of the Sunday Night game on NBC. Sage Rosenfels fumbled
twice while getting knocked to the turf, so Patrick emphasized the last
stumbling-esque syllable, as in Rosen-FELL for each miscue. Here's
another turnover: that was far from sage wordplay.

• • •

Debating debating: Speaking of "Football Night in America," I think CNN may have
done some sign-stealing this year -- it calls its debate coverage
"Debate Night in America," and somehow fits more pundits in its studio
than NBC does on Sunday night or NFL Countdown did at its zenith (it
went something like -- Jim Kelly, Tom Jackson, Chris Mortensen, Steve
Young, Chris Berman, Sterling Sharpe, Mike Ditka, Stuart Scott ... ).

You'll notice, CNN and NBC, that ESPN has trimmed it down quite a bit
since then. We viewers can only listen to one person (or exchange) at a
time, so stuffing your studio with various schmoes just ends up being

I think CNN had nine people at two different desks, plus at least three
people (including WNY native and University at Buffalo grad Wolf
Blitzer) walking around during its pre- and postgame shows. No wonder
Anderson Prada -- I'm sorry, Anderson Cooper -- has that 360 after his
name all the time. The guy must get dizzy. 

• • •

Working for the team: Ever listened to an audio broadcast of a game over the Internet (I do it all summer at
and have the choices of listening to two sets of announcers -- one for
the home team and one for the away team? I thought of that when I was
flipping back and forth between Fox News and MSNBC in the hour or so
following the vice presidential debate Thursday.

The only difference is
that during the games, the more bush-league of the baseball announcers
will use the pronouns "we" and "us" to describe the home teams. When it comes to Fox News and MSNBC, those
righty and lefty (southpaw?) networks don't use pronouns for the
political parties. But the way their main  anchors conduct themselves, they
might as well.

Try out the flipping game (or PIP-ing game) Tuesday night after the
presidential debate (to put it in sports terms, it's Game Two in a
three-game series). You'll see more spin than a Sunday's worth of spirals,
every breakaway of Denis Savard's career or Tim Lincecum's curviest

• • •

Mute button alert: And I thought Kevin Harlan was loud -- you know, "[Insert NBA
player dunking here, often LeBron James] has NO REGARD FOR HUMAN LIFE!"
Then I stumbled upon Bill O'Reilly shouting down congressman Barney
Frank on his Fox News show before the VP debate. Yikes.

• • •

TBS's "Inside MLB" had a few big hits over the weekend.

The best was Saturday night, when host Ernie Johnson announced that it
was Dennis Eckersley's birthday. Then the highlight of Kirk Gibson's
home run started to roll, and you thought that it was classic "Inside
the NBA"-esque ribbing of its panelists.

It was even better. The crew edited the highlight so that after
Gibson hobbles to the plate and connects with Eckersley's pitch, we cut
to a shot of the outfield ... where Jose Canseco makes a sliding catch.
Good stuff [I tried finding it at TBS's "hot corner," but seems like they only put the boring clips online].

After Sunday night's game, the postgame show was on until 1:15 a.m. Monday
after the Angels' extra-inning victory. "Ernie's Neat-O Stat of the
Night" was that the last time that NLCS foes Dodgers and Phillies met in the
playoffs, it was 1983. That was followed by a graphic that showed what
the panelists were doing in that year.

Cal Ripken was 23 and won the MVP and World Series for Baltimore.
Eckersley was a 29-year-old with the Boston Red Sox, and the graphic
read "5.61 ERA (career worst)." The punch line was supposed to be that
current Tiger Curtis Granderson (who is very smooth - he must have been a broadcast
journalism major or something) was only 2 years old back then, in
diapers in Blue Island, Ill.

But when Eckersley -- whose career turned around when he got sober after entering alcohol rehabilitation
following the 1986 season -- saw his not-so-great numbers up on the
screen, he yelled in mock outrage, "I almost quit that year! Sent me to
rehab for crissakes!"

Now that is some good late-night postgame TV -- the NBA show's Charles Barkley should be proud.

Earlier, Eckersley threw some, as he would say, "high cheese" for a strike by calling irksome A.J. Pierzsinski "Mr.
Congeniality" as a replay showed Pierczinski waving his bat in front of
fellow catcher Dioner Navarro while Navarro was trying to throw out a
runner attempting to steal.

• • •

Not "The Jerk": Vanderbilt football coach Bobby Johnson, who bears a resemblence to a certain comedian/actor, had just finished an ESPN interview following Saturday's big win over Auburn in which he talked about trying to remain calm on the sidelines.

When it got thrown back to the College GameDay studio, host Rece Davis zinged that Johnson was "a wiiiiiild and crazy guy." 

• • •

Miss Victory Lane: I believe this is a new phenomenon that happens after Sprint Cup
races. Apparently it is the job of an attractive female, wearing
makeup, a perma-grin and a black-and-yellow Sprint firesuit to
strategically position herself in the immediate background of the
television interview of the winning driver in victory lane.

So while
Tony Stewart was talking about his big Talladega win, there's this girl
in the black firesuit in the background just lurking and smiling. I've
seen races where the firesuited female will nod along with something
either asked or answered, as if in agreement. Very strange. Maybe the
Sprint Cup girl is there at the Sprint Cup races because Sprint wants
to remind us who sponsors the Sprint Cup.

But seriously folks, there was a time when NASCAR would have beauty
queens greeting winning drivers up on the podiums, but I thought that
practice had died out -- a good thing for a family-friendly,
sponsor-friendly sport which is seeing more and more female drivers.
This new victory lane tactic is at the very least goofy, more than a
little creepy and definitely tacky. At worst, it probably falls under
the objectifying women category. Cheerleaders are what they are, but at
least they're actually doing something -- and they don't have sponsors
stitched right under their smiles.

---Keith McShea

There are no comments - be the first to comment