Share this article

print logo

TRAINS WOULD SOLVE OUR TRAVEL PROBLEMS

No matter where we are, we want to go someplace else. The urge to travel is a sickness from which we all suffer. Our airports are so crowded that flight is a nightmare. Our roads are often so jammed with cars and trucks that we inch our way along from home to work or to what we know will be a vacation paradise -- if we can ever get there.

In many parts of our country, crowded highways run parallel to deserted railroad tracks. Train travel is a remember-when novelty to many Americans only because of the movies they've seen trains in. There are 20-year-olds who have never ridden on a train. How did we let this happen?

There's no question that the best way to move a heavy load a long distance cheaply and quickly is with steel wheels rolling on steel rails. Using railroads more would alleviate our oil shortage problem. An engine pulling a train of 10 passenger cars burns less fuel going from New York to Chicago than airplanes headed the same place, with a comparable number of people, burn on the runway before they take off.

What the railroads need is a public relations campaign to counter the lobbying efforts of businesses that prosper from travel on our roads or in the air. These include such diverse groups as the makers of cement, the manufacturers of trucks, the owners of trucks, the drivers of trucks, the giant corporations that sell the fuel to the drivers of every vehicle, the tire companies. They -- and, of course, the airlines -- all have a financial interest in discouraging travel or freight delivery by rail.

If you're old enough to have made a long trip on a train that included the luxury of sleeping in a Pullman car and dinner and breakfast in a dining car, you know how comfortable and gracious travel by rail can be. Many years ago, we took the Super Chief from New York to California, and it stopped several places along the route to pick up food specialties. In Arizona, they loaded on several varieties of ripe melons.

In my lifetime, I've made hundreds of train trips between New York City and Albany, a distance of 150 miles. The scenery is spectacular along the banks of the mighty Hudson River, and the clickity-clack of the railroad track is pleasantly hypnotic.

However, if our railroads are going to attract travelers, they have to improve. They have not kept up with the progress made by other means of transportation. The trip from New York to Albany today, optimistic railroad press releases to the contrary, often takes almost as long -- about three hours -- as it took 75 years ago. Door to door, however, it still beats flying and for one quarter the price.

The trip from Washington to New York on the new and improved Metroliner is quite civilized, although our railroads have a lot of work to do on speed before they catch up with the Europeans. Not only do trains run on time there, they are fast and dependable.

There's no reason why a train in the United States, with no traffic lights, no truck traffic, no problem with snow or rain, cannot travel at an average speed of 100 miles an hour. Too often, when you're looking out the train window, the cars on the highway in areas that are not congested are passing you by.

There's now a rail link that connects Paris, Brussels, Cologne, Amsterdam and London. A passenger can get from London to Paris through the Chunnel in a little more than four hours. It can take an hour and a half to get to Heathrow Airport from downtown London and, as we all know, you don't just walk on board when you get there. It isn't unusual to have to stand in three lines at an airport before you get to your seat.

And there's one good thing about train travel I haven't mentioned. When you get to your destination, you don't have to stand by the baggage carousel waiting for your suitcase.

Tribune Media Services

There are no comments - be the first to comment